“Automated Finance, Human Consequences: Plazo Urges Caution on AI in the Markets”
“Automated Finance, Human Consequences: Plazo Urges Caution on AI in the Markets”
Blog Article
Inside the Asian Institute of Management, Joseph Plazo—founder of the algorithmic trading firm Plazo Sullivan Roche—delivered a pointed appeal for ethical caution.
MANILA — He didn’t celebrate victory margins or machine performance.
“The machine may be faster. But are we still the ones deciding what matters?”
???? **Joseph Plazo: A Technologist Sounding the Alarm**
Plazo is not new to this space. His firm’s AI systems have posted a 99% win rate across key timeframes and are in use by institutional clients across Europe and Asia.
Yet even with these results, he insists—performance isn’t the only metric.
“AI can optimise a mistake to perfection if no one stops it.”
He shared a case from the early days of the pandemic. One of his firm’s bots flagged a short on gold just before the U.S. Federal Reserve issued an emergency policy shift.
“We overrode it. It was a machine doing math, not reading history.”
???? **Machines Act Fast. But Leadership Sometimes Waits.**
AI’s appeal lies in its instant execution. But at what cost?
“We must remember that a moment of hesitation can protect reputations—and futures.”
Plazo introduced a framework he calls **“Conviction Calculus”**—three questions that must be asked before executing an AI recommendation:
- Does this decision align with our values—not just our strategy?
- Have we cross-checked this with human knowledge—not just system signals?
- Will anyone say, ‘This was my call,’ or just point at the machine?
???? **Asia’s Race Toward AI Could Be Missing Its Compass**
Across Asia, nations are investing heavily in fintech and AI-driven innovation. From Singapore to South Korea, the push toward automation is framed as economic strategy.
But Plazo’s question cuts deeper: “Are we building intelligence without wisdom?”
He referenced multiple AI-driven losses in the past year.
“It was failure by design—because no one was allowed to stop it.”
???? **Plazo’s Vision: Trading Systems with Moral Intelligence**
Plazo is not anti-AI. He’s pro-responsibility.
His firm is developing what he calls **“narrative-integrated AI”**—models that factor in geopolitics, tone, and social context alongside market data.
“The future here isn’t faster bots—it’s smarter, humbler ones.”
That idea is already drawing attention.
One investor called Plazo’s talk:
“A necessary reckoning for financial technology.”
???? **What Happens When No One Says ‘Stop’**
Plazo ended with a thought that may echo across boardrooms:
“Emotion won’t trigger the fall. Certainty will.”
It wasn’t fearmongering. It was foresight.
Because when machines take over the trades, leadership cannot go offline.